Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?

[Charlie Cunningham]

Multi-path was my thought as well!

Merry Christmas!

73,
Charlie, K4OTV


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 11:02 AM
To: Richard (Rick) Karlquist; Art Roberts - W5AER; topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?

More likely it was a mix of groundwave and sky wave, if the station was
local, cancelling or reinforcing signal as phase shifted on the sky wave
path.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard at karlquist.com>
To: "Art Roberts - W5AER" <w5aer at hotmail.com>; <topband at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?


>
>
> On 12/24/2014 3:39 PM, Art Roberts - W5AER wrote:
>> On the thought of a low dipole:
>>
>> Years ago in Northern California, as an experiment, I had a VERY low
>> dipole and got some strange results. Listening to a local station, in
>> the afternoon, there was very deep QSB. We were able to talk, but with
>> difficulty.
>>
>> 73,
>> Art  W5AER
>>
>
> Were you cross polarized; IE was the other station running a vertical?
> If so, minor fluctuations in propagation could result in major
> fluctations of polarization cancellation.
>
> Rick N6RK
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4253/8802 - Release Date: 12/24/14
> 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband