Topband: adding another inverted l to the existing

[Alex]

Hi Jimmy,

Perhaps another solution could be to add an 80m (coaxial) trap to the 
160m inverted L. I used this approach when I lived on a small city lot 
in SC with only a single useful tree. This allowed me to use the same 
supports, radial field and wire for 80 and 160 meters.

73,
--Alex KR1ST


On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:32 PM, james soto via Topband <
topband at contesting.com> wrote:

> Actually iam using an inverted L for 160 with few radials.I would like 
> to
> build another one for 75 meters band. my questio are:1. How close they
> could be? 2. could i use the same radials existing from the 160 
> inverted
> L?Thankskp2bh/jimmy