Topband: QRP

[Robert Harmon]

Mike,

Thats good stuff !   I am putting up a 160 with 4 elevated radials at 14 
feet (would like to get them higher
but they are the least visible at 14 feet to my wife :-)
I am anxious to see how it works.

thanks for the reference info!
Bob
K6UJ




On 12/15/15 3:50 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> According to this they are close.
>
> lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html 
> <http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html>
>
> www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems 
> <http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems> - 
> scroll down to the section "QEX article on elevated radial ground 
> systems" and study the material in the links.
>
> I was amazed at how well just two elevated radials work here, though I 
> plan on four someday.
> www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna 
> <http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna>
>
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com <http://www.w0btu.com>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Robert Harmon <k6uj at pacbell.net 
> <mailto:k6uj at pacbell.net>> wrote:
>
>     Do the 160 verticals with 4 radials elevated at 20 feet,
>     individually outperform the other vertical with 60 radials on the
>     ground ?
>
>