Topband: QRPers calling CQ in the SP ?

[Herbert Schoenbohm]

1810 or 1809.9  is a good spot because it is the limit of many EU TB'ers 
and fewer East Coast big guns are parking there calling endless CQ's.

I used to have fun working on the higher bands nearby stations using a 
light build (dummy load).  This could be a 20X or 100X mult but let's 
hope not. Then how about just coupling into the power box with some 
blocking capacitors if you live in the country and can't get up a wire.  
Problem with that is the performance would be an infinite numbers of 
variables each one would be infinitely variable.

There has to be a "no antenna at all" award in the works.☺


Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

On 12/24/2015 2:31 PM, Barry N1EU wrote:
> Rumor says that it's 1810KHz but I don't really see it being relevant in
> TBDC
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:23 PM, jh-mty at sbcglobal.net <jh-mty at sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Me neither.  And Jim B is a QRPer (howdy from PG, Jim), so pray-tell....de
>> W6UQZ
>>
>>
>>        From: Jim Brown <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>
>>   To: topband at contesting.com
>>   Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:19 AM
>>   Subject: Re: Topband: QRPers calling CQ in the SP ?
>>
>> On Thu,12/24/2015 10:03 AM, Jim F. via Topband wrote:
>>> Will try to make an attempt this year on the hour around the QRPwatering
>> hole. (QRPers know where that is ! )
>>
>> I don't. And why conceal it?
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband