Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N

[Tom W8JI]

> ""  RHR requires a log in name, password, and they watch IPs. After some
> early abuse, they started checking to be sure the name and password come
> from the same IP or IP pool as the user name and password combo. When it 
> is
> a foreign user, of which there are a limited number, the traffic is
> watched."
>
> Hi Tom
>
> Yes. Everything is so clear and controlled by RHR that no one will use the
> remote station to work  a new DXCC because they/he/she must use  /p or /W4 
> ,
> That use of /remote call sign makes the QSO invalid for DXCC.
>
> So, why not published the call sign of all RHR users and  send it to DXCC
> desk!
>
> Let's make this clear and transparent.
>
> DXCC can create a new category for RHR DXCC users?
>
> Is this IT9 is a RHR customer?

I wouldn't know who their customers are, or how many customers they have.

I only care how someone can use my station.

I don't really understand the fuss. The last good DXCC's were when we had a 
mileage limit. Even then, someone could use a second site. It was actually 
common to use second sites. W1BU did it from a swamp, even W1BB had two 
stations. People used BC towers, it wasn't their stuff. One guy used a VOA 
antenna system. Everyone used to admire that. People would go to other 
stations as far back as I can remember.

People come here and operate all the time. They work new countries.

Now, suddenly, it is so unfair. How can we survive?

73 Tom