Topband: Elimination of Treadmill RFI on 160 meters

Tom W8JI w8ji at w8ji.com
Fri Jan 30 06:16:32 EST 2015


> This snide remark ignores the fact that it is generally not practical (nor 
> is it good politics) to go inside your neighbor's equipment to add bypass 
> capacitors. Nor is it practical to open up a wall wart, nor even most 
> consumer equipment. It also ignores the fact that much of RFI at HF is 
> common mode, not differential mode, caused by bonding failures (the Pin 
> One Problem and its power systems equivalent). And it ignores the fact 
> that it is often the cable shield or the power system equipment ground 
> that is carrying the RF noise current, for reasons noted in my earlier 
> post.

It isn't a snide remark, it is how we focus on chokes.

Any filtering or decoupling system works by the ratio of series impedance to 
shunt impedances.

A series choke is useless unless there is some value of shunt impedance in 
the system. As a matter of fact, lack of established shunt impedances is 
what can drive choke requirements to unrealistic values. This is true in 
baluns, just like it is in line filters.

Most outlet strips and devices have room inside for several UL/CSA/ VDE 
approved bypass capacitors. Rather than paying $30 or much more for some 
capacitors in a physically large filter can, with minimal choke impedance 
inside, one might consider a few well-spent dollars for external components.

Many times RFI is cured simply by bypassing and closing a loop through a 
device, where choke requirements alone would be astronomical or ineffective.

73 Tom

 



More information about the Topband mailing list