Topband: Fwd: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input

[Tom W8JI]

I don't understand the sudden hysteria, except it may be Internet driven.

Around 52 years ago, my first or second 160 meter California contact was 
with remote W6YY. I can't remember if W6VSS Dale or W6YY was first, but that 
was when the band was split and the power limit was maybe 25 watts plate 
input power.

In the 1970's, when it was actually very difficult to work DXCC, W2EQS 
(Charlie) had almost made 100 DXCC on 160. His age and health forced him to 
move to Indiana, and he lost all of those credits.

Today (and for a long time now) anyone anywhere in the USA (remotely or 
locally) can operate anyone else's station in the USA under their call, or 
someone else can come in (remotely or physically) operate their station 
using the local call. People around here come in physically and operate my 
station, and they have for many years. It counts for their DXCC.

This leads me to think the sudden recent wave of hysteria about DXCC is 
based on people actually wanting one of three things:

1.) In spite of being legal for over 50 years, all remotes to be banned

2.) In spite of being legal for around 35 years that I know of, they want 
the rules changed so a station has to sign callsign / district or say 
portable and then district when transmitting from any location other than 
the station owner and builder location, and so no guest op can ever use his 
call. This is the way it was before the FCC changed that rule, which I think 
happened in the 1980's.

Since the FCC is unlikely to change rules because of an award that has not 
had that much meaning about being tied to any location, station, or operator 
since maybe 1980 or so, they want a new DXCC. They want a new DXCC that 
requires the contact to be made by the physical owner of the station at one 
location.

To me, the real issue is people are unhappy either with the use of a remote 
of any type (which has been legal as long as I have been a Ham and has been 
used for DXCC and contests since I have been licensed)  or they suddenly 
want DXCC to be tied to a station at a single location that the DXCC 
recipient owns.

I think the mob got all worked up because they didn't think about the actual 
rules, they just dislike RHR (and not the dozens of free uncontrolled 
remotes all over the place). For years they have been competing against 
people who use other people's stations, move around, or have a remote. Now, 
out of the clear blue sky, DXCC is suddenly useless when the actual changes 
than made it useless were made over 30 years ago.

I think the real solution is a DXCC endorsement or a new DXCC that requires 
the holder to swear he did it all transmitting and receiving from one 
location all by himself with gear he assembled.