Topband: ARRL 160
Tim Shoppa
tshoppa at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 15:19:44 EST 2016
In Emails with the ARRL 160M and 10M logchecker in past few years he has confirmed to me that their logchecking software supports XQSO: at least for those two contests.
Tim N3QE
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Tree <tree at kkn.net> wrote:
>
> There is no penalty for busting a callsign - so manually entering a busted
> callsign is a perfect way to deal with the situation. Just make one letter
> different. Nothing lost - you just lose the QSO.
>
> Tree
>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Talk about self-sacrifice. LOL
>>
>> If it's possible in CQ Contests, ARRL should implement it too.
>>
>> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Tom Haavisto <kamham69 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Another option would be to bust the other guys call (on purpose) in your
>>> log. You take an extra "hit" - you loose the QSO, plus penalty, but it
>>> gets the job done if that is the intent.
>>>
>>> Tom - VE3CX
>>>
>>>
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
More information about the Topband
mailing list