Topband: ARRL 160

Tim Shoppa tshoppa at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 15:19:44 EST 2016


In Emails with the ARRL 160M and 10M logchecker in past few years he has confirmed to me that their logchecking software supports XQSO: at least for those two contests.

Tim N3QE

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Tree <tree at kkn.net> wrote:
> 
> There is no penalty for busting a callsign - so manually entering a busted
> callsign is a perfect way to deal with the situation.  Just make one letter
> different.  Nothing lost - you just lose the QSO.
> 
> Tree
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Talk about self-sacrifice. LOL
>> 
>> If it's possible in CQ Contests, ARRL should implement it too.
>> 
>> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Tom Haavisto <kamham69 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Another option would be to bust the other guys call (on purpose) in your
>>> log.  You take an extra "hit" - you loose the QSO, plus penalty, but it
>>> gets the job done if that is the intent.
>>> 
>>> Tom - VE3CX
>>> 
>>> 
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>> 
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


More information about the Topband mailing list