Topband: Fwd: ET7L DXCC approval

[DXer]

So...the ARRL does not care. Libertarianism at its best, nothing wrong with
that.

Point taken about this reflector not being the place for this discussion.
End of story for me. :^)

73 de Vince, VA3VF

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Mike Cizek W0VTT <mgcizek at gmail.com> wrote:

> The reflector isn't the place to start a discussion of what is and what is
> not acceptable, but the League has made their decision about remote ops.
> From the DXCC rules:
>
>
>
> 11.  Issues concerning remotely controlled operating and DXCC are best
> dealt with by each individual carefully considering the ethical limits that
> he/she will accept for his/her DXCC and other operating awards.
>
>
>
> <cut>
>
>
>
> It will continue to be up to the operator to decide what types of legal
> remote control operating he/she will use (if any) to contribute to an
> operating award.
>
>
>
> Naturally, I have my opinions, and will gladly share them over a few
> beers.
>
>
>
> I've been a card checker since the program started, and am happy to say
> that I have only found one case of a card being changed from 18 to 1.8
> MHz.  The guy didn't even TRY to make it look good - couldn't believe it.
>
>
>
> --
>
> 73,
>
> Mike Cizek WØVTT
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of DXer
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 08:51
> To: topband at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval
>
>
>
> This is going to be a much bigger issue than the adultered 18M QSLs. :^)
>
>
>
> I don't know how easy it is to detect the use of a remote RX, unless a P5
>
> contact at 12 noon local time is claimed. :^))
>
>
>
> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Johann Bruinier <Bruinier at t-online.de>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Another unpleasant item is the growing use of remote RXs. It's not
>
> > difficult to identify the fakers but does ARRL care?
>
> >
>
> > Seasons' Greetings & 73!
>
> >
>
> > Jan DL9KR.
>
> >
>
> _________________
>
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>