jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
Fri Jan 1 13:49:31 EST 2016
On Fri,1/1/2016 10:04 AM, D. Scott MacKenzie wrote:
> I like your RBN testing - nice idea. I wonder if the process could be
> automated to some extent by using WSPR. By proper programing you could
> alternate antennas. Might be an interesting to try. This way you could let
> it run over a period of time, and collected. Data is gathered in SNR and 6
> digit grid. Data can then be analyzed and presented in a suitable format.
Yes, with any evaluation of antenna performance, more data from more
points over greater time is better.
We did what we could easily do without that automation. I don't know
enough about WSPR to know the extent to which two QRP rigs at the same
site could TX with different callsigns in alternate transmission cycles.
Another limitation is the number of WSPR stations active on 80M with
antennas good enough to hear us.
73, Jim K9YC
More information about the Topband