Topband: Strange propagation
herbert.schoenbohm at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 20:34:04 EST 2016
Well so much for the ARRL card checkers as unless the checker here in a
U.S. Territory has a DXCC on 160 they will not accredit him/her and I
must send the cards for 160 meter (just 160 meters) via the post
office. Another one of the ARRL's inconsistent policies that makes no
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 1/14/2016 9:19 PM, Kris Mraz wrote:
> Boxbe <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible for
> Automatic Cleanup! (n5kilomike at gmail.com) Add cleanup rule
> | More info
> Which brings to mind another issue: 160m card checkers will disallow a
> card if the
> DX QSO occurred in the middle of the day since the path would be impossible.
> Can't make that assumption, anymore.
> Kris N5KM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry <pacer99 at aol.com>
> To: barry.n1eu <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 10:22 pm
> Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
> More than once I have worked some Ukraine station in the 160 meter
> contest at S9 plus when it is broad daylight in UB5. Obviously they
> are operating a remote station. Guess I need to log them, Ha.
> The kicker is when i receive a QSL card direct and they expect a return.
> Yes I understand the need to integrate modern technology into ham
> radio. Remote stations,
> remote receiving locations etc. My opinion is that if you cant operate
> from your physical location for what ever the reason then try another
> Happy new year!
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
More information about the Topband