Topband: strange propagation

[Larry Burke]

Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer".

- Larry K5RK

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Larry
Burke
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:23 AM
To: 'Louis Parascondola'; topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal
review? How interesting. 

 

You said you can get the "ruling" that the RHR guys go by. The QST product
review is it?!?

 

- Larry K5RK

 

From: Louis Parascondola [mailto:gudguyham at aol.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:10 AM
To: wi5a at sbcglobal.net; topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

 

Larry, I posted it all an hour ago.



-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <wi5a at sbcglobal.net>
To: topband <topband at contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 9:03 am
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

> RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure this has been legally looked at.
I can get the ruling they go by.



We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola. 





- Larry K5RK

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband