Topband: JT-65

[Mike Waters]

How about JT-9? It's even more sensitive on 160m than JT-65, and only takes
up 1/10 the bandwidth. Here it is in JT's own words:

physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:47 AM, rick darwicki via Topband <
topband at contesting.com> wrote:

> It is totally amazing, I have an S-7 noise level, cannot hear a peep of
> any kind of audio and I decode signals and make contacts with the ghost
> stations on 1838.I hope 8-9 DX guys come up so I can finish DXCC on 160 hi
> hi Rick N6PE
>