Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna
joelgray77 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 11:06:04 EST 2018
For the last two seasons, I had two 225' BOGs put out; one pointing NE, and
one pointing SE. They worked well. I also have a K9AY, and in general, I
like the K9AY performance better than the BOGs. And it provides 4
directions in a small footprint. Mine hangs from a tree branch. I found
that occasionally one of the BOGs would work a bit better than the K9AY,
but not very often. I am debating whether to even put the BOGs out this
year. That being said, BOGs can work well, are pretty simple to do, and
fairly inexpensive. I have not tried the reversible kind so can't comment
on that part. 73.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM N4ZR <n4zr at comcast.net> wrote:
> I've just spent a very educational hour with Google Earth looking at my
> Beverage options for 160M. On a 45/225 azimuth I can only get about 215
> feet. Is that even worth doing with a conventional Beverage? What about
> a BOG? Because of my lot layout I will need to use a reversible 2-wire
> Beverage with the NE end right outside my shack. Don't know if the
> KD9SV reversing transformers will work for a BOG.
> My other reasonable receiving option is a K9AY loop or similar.
> Transmitting antenna will be an inverted L, with vertical section
> probably no more than 60 feet. I'd like to finish my 160M DXCC this
> winter if possible
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
More information about the Topband