Topband: Fresnel Zone
Mpridesti
mpridesti at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 18 11:45:05 EDT 2019
Ray
Didn’t you get the memo regarding Maine is now closed to any new Amateur stations? Thought it was full up!
Ref. Fresnel zone - looks real bad :)
Regards,
Mark, K1RX
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Ray Higgins <ray.w2re at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have two questions about fresnel zone.
>
> I just purchased 22.5/ac near the ocean near Machiasport, ME. This is in the Northeast corner of Maine about 30 miles south of Eastport and a Lubec. This is going to be my personal Remote Contest station! I plan to be contesting from this new qth starting in 2020 but will be QRV by mid 2019 for testing.
> This qth is anywhere between 1-3 miles from the ocean or the bay, it sits on a high plateau 150’ asl thats slopes in all directions to saltwater (peninsula) except N/NW. The property has a saltwater river and marsh that runs the perimeter from south to north favoring the NE direction, the marsh is only 50-100' wide and 1500-2000’ away from the property. The land has a gradual slope to the marsh.
>
> My questions:
>
> 1.) Is the saltwater river bed/marsh wide enough to be an effective field in the Fresnal Zone?
> 2.) What is the wavelengths needed to be within the Fresnal zone of a river/marsh compared to an ocean?
>
> In this photo album (last pic) I have outlined the river saltwater marsh and property boundry from a google earth shot. https://photos.app.goo.gl/ui79t2jFo95b29et6
>
> I’m only concerned about 80 and 160m in the Fresnal Zone.
>
> Any input would be welcomed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray W2RE
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
More information about the Topband
mailing list