Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation
Greg - ZL3IX
zl3ix at inet.net.nz
Sat Oct 12 14:54:10 EDT 2019
Guys need to be more discriminatory when discussing remote operation. I
use a remote installation, and have for years, but I abide by the DXCC
rules which state that the Tx and Rx antennas have to be within 500 m of
each other. Furthermore, this installation I designed and built myself,
and I maintain myself, with great effort. This practice should NOT be
equated with the practice of using a random Rx installation on the Net,
probably not even in the same country as the operator using it.
73, Greg, ZL3IX
On 2019-10-13 07:34, WW3S wrote:
> Good for you Roger....you always hear about hams using remotes to work the dx, but they don’t usually say much when the dx uses a remote to hear them....
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Oct 12, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Roger D Johnson <n1rj at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>>
>> There is no way an organization such as the ARRL can prevent cheating in the DXCC program. It has to depend on the honesty of the hams involved. Yes..some
>> people will cheat but I can't see how they can derive any satisfaction from
>> that.
>>
>> Last year I worked VU2GSM on Top Band. I heard rumors that Kanti used remote
>> receiving locations and, when asked, he freely admitted it. He's in my log
>> but I didn't claim credit for that contact.
>>
>> YMMV!
>>
>> 73, Roger N1RJ
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
More information about the Topband
mailing list