Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L

[Peter Krulewitch]

I should have stated for the comparison that I have 4 elevated radials under the inverted L W2LL

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 19, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
> 
>  An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent over correct?
> 
> So a major part of an inverted "L" just as in a regular vertical is the ground system.
> Correct?
> 
> Now how elevated radials work great in a regular vertical, only need like 4 to equal miles of wire in ground mounted radial field.
> 
> Will elevated radials work  for an inverted "L"?
> 
> How about few and shorter than full length elevated radials as in a N6BT design?
> 
> Joe WB9SBD
> <CLEAN-IDLE-TYME-LOGO-120x96.jpg>
> 
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 4/19/2020 11:35 AM, daraymond at iowatelecom.net wrote:
>> The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the time.  The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other times) when horizontal polarization can work better.            73. . . Dave, W0FLS 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Peter Krulewitch 
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 11:28 AM 
>> To: topband at contesting.com 
>> Subject: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L 
>> 
>> Have used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx fer your ideas.W2LL 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone 
>> _________________ 
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 
>> _________________ 
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 
>> 
>