Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L

[Gene Smar]

Gents:

     I will support Fred's recommendation for RX antennas on TB.  Even my modest back yard could fit three bi-directional EWE's in delta layout among the trees.  I was flabbergasted at how well the signals popped out of the noise compared to my inverted L TX antenna.

73 de
Gene Smar  AD3F


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+ersmar=verizon.net at contesting.com] On Behalf Of fmoeves
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 6:25 PM
To: topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L

I agree with what others have said. Best thing I did here in my noisy area was a Rx antenna. There's no way I could listen to my inverted L here in KY. KB4QZH
-------- Original message --------From: daraymond at iowatelecom.net Date: 4/19/20  12:35 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Peter Krulewitch <epetek1 at gmail.com>, topband at contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the time.  The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other times) when horizontal polarization can work better.            73. . . Dave, W0FLS-----Original Message----- From: Peter KrulewitchSent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 11:28 AMTo: topband at contesting.comSubject: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted LHave used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx fer your ideas.W2LLSent from my iPhone_________________Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector