Topband: Shunt Fed Tower SWR Troubles

[Dave Cuthbert]

The balun heating hypothesis could be tested by disconnecting the balun.

  Dave, KH6AQ


On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:06 AM Dale Drake <daleaa1qd at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's my problem. I'm experiencing SWR problems
> with 160M shunt feed on my tower.  Using a gamma
> match with HV air variable caps I am able adjust
> the tap point to get a very nice SWR curve using
> my AA-35 Zoom analyzer.  The problem I having is
> that when transmitting the SWR goes up with power
> and if I key-down for very long the SWR rises
> rapidly and takes off.
>
> My set up is 70ft Rohn 25 with about 22 feet of
> mast above the top of the tower.  At the top of
> the mast is a Diamond 2M/440 vertical.  At 15 feet
> above the tower top is an XM-240 and 2 feet above
> the tower top is a 4el SteppIR.  The elements of
> the SteppIR are fully retracted.  All of the coax
> and control lines are run from ground level inside
> the tower up to the service loop. On the mast
> above the tower the coax is tywrapped to the mast.
> There are 60 ground radials with an average length
> of 90ft.  The reflector of the XM-240 is insulated
> from the boom and the driven element is fed
> through a Comtek 1:1 balun. All of the coax
> shields are grounded at the tower base.
>
> I have an 80M gamma matched shunt on this tower
> that plays FB with no weird SWR stuff going on.
>
> I suspect that what is causing my 160M trouble is
> that RF is coupling through the 40M coax, through
> the balun and into the driven element. Somehow the
> coupling changes with power, which I don't
> understand.  I suspect that when I key-down and
> the SWR takes off, the core in the balun is
> getting hot and the magnetic properties are
> shifting until it cools off and returns to normal.
>
> My plan to try to correct this problem is to
> connect the center of the XM-240 reflector to the
> boom and to mount a box at the XM-240 feed point
> with 2 vacuum relays that I will use to connect
> the driven element to the boom when I'm on160.
> This will be a considerable effort and expense so
> I'm looking for the group's input as to the
> soundness of my plan or if there may be other
> approaches that would be less difficult to try
> first.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dale, AA1QD
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>