Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

[uy0zg]

Thanks Frank
These numbers speak volumes:

14        55
15        47
16         5

I've seen you here many times :

http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=3

But I never heard it even once ..

For all my CQ WW I don't remember such weak conditions (  (towards NA).




---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

donovanf at erols.com писал 2020-12-02 09:29:
> Hi Nick,
> 
> W3LPL was multi-single, we spent very limited time
> on Topband except to chase multipliers.
> 
> We worked 160 QSOs, 21 Zones and 70 countries on Topband
> 
> Conditions appeared to be normal to Europe but poor
> on paths crossing the auroral zone such as Zone 16
> 
> There was significantly less Topband activity than in recent years,
> perhaps because both 80 and 40 meters were excellent all night.
> 
> Zone     QSOs01 1 02 1
> 03 1 04 16
> 05 12
> 06 1
> 07 2
> 08 6
> 09 4
> 10 1 11 1
> 13 1
> 14 55 15 47 16 5 20 4
> 21 1
> 31 1 33 4 35 2 40 1
> 
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
> 
> -------------------------
> 
> FROM: "uy0zg" <uy0zg at mksat.net>
> TO: donovanf at erols.com
> CC: topband at contesting.com, "Topband"
> <topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net at contesting.com>
> SENT: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM
> SUBJECT: Re: Topband: FW:  CQWW a bust this year
> 
> Hi
> 
> Frank
> 
> May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in
> this
> CQ WW ?
> 
> ---
> Nick, UY0ZG
> http://www.topband.in.ua
> 
> donovanf at erols.com писал 2020-12-01 20:20:
>> Of course Lee is absolutely correct.
>> 
>> 
>> Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas
>> have given up too easily during the troubleshooting process.
>> 
>> 
>> 73
>> Frank
>> W3LPL
>   Topband Reflector