Topband: DXCC Committe

[uy0zg]

Wes

You want to say that such a tricky way (presenting a fake card without 
an application) should go unpunished?


---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

Wes писал 2020-03-23 19:35:
> Based upon the supplied communications, it's unclear to me whether
> there was an actual application made along with the submitted card or
> not.  Jarda claims not, but based on the disqualification, if it
> followed its own rules, ARRL must have received one because...
> 
> The DXCC AWARD APPLICATION form states, "Required With Each New
> Submission and Endorsements"
> 
> If the "required" application/fees and affirmed signature weren't
> submitted, then he did not make an application and whether or not the
> card is bogus should not matter.
> 
> So there should be one of two outcomes:
> 
> 1)  He submitted a signed application affirming that he followed all
> of the rules, but submitted a bogus card.  His removal is justified.
> 
> 2)  He did not submit a signed application but only asked for an
> opinion about the card.  He should be reinstated.
> 
> Seems pretty simple to me.
> 
> Wes  N7WS
> 
> On 3/23/2020 8:27 AM, K9FD wrote:
>> Well let me be the 2nd then to comment,
>> 
>> Its clear as friggin day,  guy sent in a doctored card,  pasted a 
>> printer label
>> over the top of a QSO for another band,  ARRL saw it in person and 
>> said
>> "Fake" card,  and disqualified him
>> 
>> His gripe is he was just sending it to "test" them to check it out,  
>> didnt really
>> mean to submit it,
>> If they would have just passed it through and given credit,  do you 
>> think he
>> would have said one word.
>> 
>> No translation needed,  simple easy logic.    Attitude or tone BS,
>> Facts are facts.
>> 
>> Merv K9FD
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
> Reflector