Topband: ARRL 160M and 1830-1835 change

Stein-Roar Brobakken post at lb3re.com
Thu Oct 22 22:26:01 EDT 2020


Hello

This been into global bandplanning by IARU
80,40m also have contest free segments actually !
For those who want to run DX qso non contest
80m 3500-3510 KHz DX window
80m 3650-3700 Khz
80m 3790-3800 KHz DX window
40m 7100-7130 KHz  7110 is Emergency QRG
20m 14100-14125 KHz 

Now 1830-1835 KHz is such area also!!! 

Coz outside US we have in contest permition to use CW and KW 1850-1900 or some 1850-2000 KHz

So must take this with your regulator.

Best Regards,
Stein-Roar Brobakken
post at lb3re.com
LB3RE K3RAG 
Skype: lb3re.rag

> 23. okt. 2020 kl. 03:31 skrev GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv at atlanticbb.net>:
> 
> If 1,830 - 1,835 is reserved for "intercontinental contacts", who will should CQ? The DX? He is not a DX on his own continent. These "DX windows" are not practical.
> 73,
> George
> C6AGU/AA7JV
> 
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:43:52 +0000 (UTC)
>> Jon Zaimes via Topband <topband at contesting.com> wrote:
>> Interesting Tim.
>> November QST came in a few days ago, and the summary of rules in there says "1.830-1.835 MHz should be used for intercontinental contacts only."
>> Dropping that rule was long overdue so glad to see it stated in the rules online. 73/Jon AA1K
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa at gmail.com>
>> To: topBand List <topband at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2020 9:35 am
>> Subject: Topband: ARRL 160M and 1830-1835 change
>> 
>> Also as I review this years ARRL 160M rules...
>> 
>> An earlier version of the rules (current in 2012) here
>> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Rules%20PDFs/2012/2012-160M-Rules-V2.pdf
>> says "6.1 The segment 1.830 to 1.835 should be used for intercontinental
>> QSOs only".
>> 
>> The latest version here
>> https://contests.arrl.org/ContestRules/160M-Rules.pdf notes that "6. the
>> 1830-135 kHz window is no longer reserved for W/VE-to-DX QSOs in this
>> contest".
>> 
>> Does anyone recall, when the rule was officially changed? It wasn't being
>> well respected in some previous years if it was in effect.
>> 
>> Tim N3QE
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


More information about the Topband mailing list