Topband: Inverted J antennas?
Grant Saviers
grants2 at pacbell.net
Tue Jan 12 15:12:02 EST 2021
For a portable helix loaded 160m vertical, I measured 1 and 2 127ft
radials at 3.5ft and 6.5ft above ground (average or worse) and found a
significant difference in the resonance R.
1 radial 3.5ft 50 ohms
1 radial @ 6.5ft 33 ohms
2 radials @ 6.5ft 28 ohms
Which quantified the change in ground loss for this situation. The
perfect ground R was about 11 ohms for this vertical design. More
radials higher will further reduce ground loss.
Two radials at 10ft or higher for a decent height (>70ft) T or L will
work pretty well and only be a couple db or so down from the recommended
8+ much higher. N6LF has the plots on his website.
NEC2 models verticals with elevated radials pretty well, and can compute
the theoretical R over perfect ground. Then with the radials you can
afford or fit the antenna can be modeled and the efficiency compared.
Grant KZ1W
On 1/12/2021 10:48, sawyered at earthlink.net wrote:
> Mike, All ¼ wave verticals have the same elevation angles. The question is
> what is the feedpoint efficiency which is dominated by the ground. That
> ground is a combination of your soil characteristics and the radial field
> design. In my opinion, 2 elevated radials about 5 ft above the ground is a
> poor ground system for good performance. Elevated 160M radials really need
> to be more like 20 – 25 ft above the ground to be efficient. Otherwise, my
> experience has been you are way better off putting a lot of them on the
> ground vs a few in the air – below 10 ft.
>
>
>
> One thing to try is take a Z + R reading at the actual feedpoint as it is
> now and add 2 more radials. If the R drops by more than 0.5 Ohm, then keep
> adding.
>
>
>
> I started with an R of about 24 Ohms with 4 radials on the ground and got it
> down to 12 Ohms by adding radials. I have 44. I could not see any
> difference with the last 4 so I stopped. I have 2 T top verticals in phase
> and they are 260 ft apart. And the same result occurred on both. That is
> highly a function of my rocky (Granite) soil here.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>
More information about the Topband
mailing list