Friends in Radioland - With signals from the Peter I DXpedtion about to show up on the band and solar minimum not far off, it is of interest to rate the challenges that will be presented to DX operators. To that end, I've developed a rating system, not in terms of distance, but the loss of a DX station's signal in reaching three centers of amateur activity - North America (W0), Western Europe (DL) and Asia (JA). Signal loss is due mainly to ionospheric absorption and signal spreading. Keeping in mind that absorption loss varies linearly with distance and spreading varies as the inverse-square of distance, by defining DX paths as beyond 4,000 km, we can evaluate paths in ionospheric terms. For the 4,000 km standard path, the loss on 1.8 mHz due to spreading amounts to 72 dB and about 40 dB due to absorption at night. Taking those values for 4,000 km standard paths, we obtain the following for additional losses, in dB, for DX signals to reach all three centers of amateur activity: Sub-Antarctic Indian Ocean Western Pacific VK0H ---- 342 VK9C ---- 245 P2 ----- 216 3Y/P ---- 340 VK9W ---- 242 KC6 ----- 169 VK0 ----- 338 VQ9 ----- 233 DU ----- 160 VP8/SS -- 337 8Q ------ 202 KH2 ----- 156 VP8/SO -- 337 VU/L ---- 183 KH0 ----- 152 VP8/SA -- 335 VU/A ---- 177 KH9 ----- 141 Central Pacific Atlantic Arctic FO ------ 247 ZD8 ----- 228 OY ------- 59 T31 ----- 209 8P ------ 161 VE8 ------ 57 T33 ----- 198 6Y ------ 142 JX ------- 50 T30 ----- 196 C6 ------ 124 JW ------- 47 KH5 ----- 189 VP9 ----- 107 UA1/FJL -- 46 T32 ----- 188 CU ------- 97 UA1/NZ -- 45 So working Peter I will be comparable to the difficulty earlier in connection with VK0IR at Heard Island. The "good news" is there won't be a "dead zone" in western USA, as was the case with VK0IR. If you're curious about any DX site, just give me the prefix, its latitude and longitude; I'll send you the rating. 73, Bob, NM7M