[TowerTalk] Verticals of Rohn 25
ROBERT WANDERER
aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us
Tue, 22 Apr 1997 20:29:27 -0700
No, but it's essentially useless (wasted resources) for the purpose you intended it for.
Send your fax # or snail mail address to my work e-mail address
and I'll send you an article about it.
<bobwanderer@polyphaser.com>
73, Bob AA0CY
----------
From: Chuck Dietz[SMTP:ke5fi@wt.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 1997 1:01 PM
To: K7LXC@aol.com
Cc: btippett@hub.infoave.net; Towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Verticals of Rohn 25
K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-04-22 04:51:12 EDT, ke5fi@wt.net (Chuck Dietz (KE5FI))
> writes:
>
> > I just run a wire down the length of the tower...
>
> Conventional wisdom for tower lightning protection discourages this
> technique. The two parallel conductors represent possible voltage potential
> differences and possible arcing.
It is taped to the tower on the way down. I doubt there would be much
potential difference. ?
Chuck, KE5FI
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com