ORION Weakness ?
Tue, 11 Feb 1997 11:05:56 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-02-10 14:14:27 EST, you write:
> I'm not
>a mechanical engineer, but it seems to me that spreading the torque over
>the larger outside diameter of the Create case is 'better' than having
>all the torque concentrated on the small output shaft of the ORION.
>I know ORION has gone to a splined output shaft and presummably will
>not have the keyway problems of the old HDR-300, but.... is that still
>a poorer design than the more traditional Create shape ? Or does the
>splined shaft eliminate any slopiness there, making the whole thing
>just as sturdy as the Create ? Will the Create probably have a longer
>life expectancy than the ORION ? Also, how is the quality of the
>direction sensing pot ? Are they equally likely to survive years outdoors ?
>Maybe someone who has seen the insides of both rotators can comment ??
>I'd like to buy American..but I'm trying to decided if the ORION is the way
>to go.. All opinions/comments appreciated !
The splined output shaft of the Orion is brute. It should be one of the
last things to fail. Sorry, I haven't seen a Create so can't comment on its
The mast clamp of the Orion is also a thing of beauty and MUCH stronger
than anything else on the market. The cast aluminum Create/Yaesu/etal. mast
clamps are easy to break during installation and I don't think the holding
capacity is anywhere near that of the Orion.
Comments received on TowerTalk from Create owners has been been very
good. I've installed a number of the Orions and they have their fans as
73, Steve K7LXC
TOWER TECH -- professional tower supplies and services for amateurs
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & N4VJ / K4AAA