NEC & Tower Permits

[Del Seay]

I don't have my copy of NEC here, but if I'm not mistaken, the
code you're referring to was written to require seperation of
conductors on a utility line, such as power distribution and
telephone/cable tv lines run on the same supports. (Poles, buried,
etc) 


John Brosnahan wrote:
> 


> >>>Again, yes, it's a good idea, but is it really "code"?  (I don't have
> >>>the NEC handy to determine if what his says is valid or correct.)
> 
> Ken,
> 
> I think you are correct in your interpretation.  I was just trying
> to quote part of the NEC and show that 1)  that paragraph does exist
> and 2)  that it addresses <250V rather than >250V.
> 
> Chad will have to argue the interpretation on his own, but it is clear
> to me that it doesn't mean "falling" distance.
> 
> John
> 
> John Brosnahan
> La Salle Research Corp.
> 24115 County Road 40
> La Salle, CO 80645 USA
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 K7LXC@contesting.com
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & N4VJ / K4AAA