[TowerTalk] Strategy for Lightning P

[Steve Weisbrod]

Maybe we should send everything to Chris first then he could edit it   
censor it and include only the things he thinks are really important in   
the format he thinks it would look best. Sorry Chris just couldn't resist   
the flame.

73 Steve W8GAZ

 ----------
From:  Chris R.Burger
Sent:  Thursday, July 10, 1997 2:31 PM
To:  steve; 'towertalk@contesting.com'
Subject:  Re: [TowerTalk] Strategy for Lightning P

Original Subject:
Re: [TowerTalk] Strategy for Lightning Protection

(Anthony R. Gold) writes:
>I believe the problem is that this list, like many other are (IMVHO)
>badly configured such that replying to the list is quite hard.

Maybe this is not a bad thing.

Many of the messages that land up on the Reflector should never have
been there.  Just imagine what it would be like if it was easy!

The way it is set up covers 90% of situations.  Reply to the sender,
who should then summarise and post it.

Occasionally, very occasionally, one might have something to say
that's actually profound enough that other people might want to see
it too.  In that case, a canned address in your mailing list software
should do the trick, without too much effort.

Chris R. Burger
ZS6EZ

 --
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:     http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:			  http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm