[TowerTalk] Rohn 25G or 45G?
K7LXC@aol.com
K7LXC@aol.com
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 03:24:58 EDT
In a message dated 98-07-04 01:03:37 EDT, w5robert@blkbox.com writes:
> On subject of 45G being more than 25G.
>
> ROHN BOOK:
> 80 FOOT TALL
> 25G 70MPH-15.7 SQ.FT.
> 45G 70MPH-15.3 SQ.FT.
> OR
> 100 FOOT TALL
> 25G 70MPH-15.0 SQ.FT.
> 45G 70MPH-14.2 SQ.FT.
>
> Interesting that at 70MPH ratings the 25G has higher SQ.FT. ratings. Go to
> 90MPH & 45G is better as we expect. But there's no question the 45G wider
> leg spacing adds stability when you climb'um.
>
Here's the reason for the windload figures. Per Note #4 in the General
Notes on the drawings, Rohn has deducted 8.0 sq.ft. of wind loading for a
commercial antenna mount. For ham purposes, add the 8.0 sq.ft. to the tower
capacity figure for TOTAL wind load.
Cheers, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm