[TowerTalk] Rohn 25G or 45G?

K7LXC@aol.com K7LXC@aol.com
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 03:24:58 EDT


In a message dated 98-07-04 01:03:37 EDT, w5robert@blkbox.com writes:

> On subject of 45G being more than 25G.
>  
>  ROHN BOOK:
>  80 FOOT TALL
>  25G   70MPH-15.7 SQ.FT.
>  45G   70MPH-15.3 SQ.FT.  
>  OR
>  100 FOOT TALL
>  25G   70MPH-15.0 SQ.FT.
>  45G   70MPH-14.2 SQ.FT.
>  
>  Interesting that at 70MPH ratings the 25G has higher SQ.FT. ratings.  Go to
>  90MPH & 45G is better as we expect.  But there's no question the 45G wider
>  leg spacing adds stability when you climb'um.  
>  
       Here's the reason for the windload figures. Per Note #4 in the General
Notes on the drawings, Rohn has deducted 8.0 sq.ft. of wind loading for a
commercial antenna mount. For ham purposes, add the 8.0 sq.ft. to the tower
capacity figure for TOTAL wind load. 

Cheers,  Steve   K7LXC

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm