[TowerTalk] city council horror
Stu Greene
wa2moe@doitnow.com
Sun, 12 Jul 1998 12:26:09 -0700
for want of another name, Lee, yes it is. 73 Stu
At 09:07 AM 7/12/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Isn't called "Grandfathering"?
>Lee
>
>At 02:22 PM 7/11/98 -0700, Stu Greene wrote:
>>
>>I think you better read the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the
>>Constitution. Once erected legally, no matter what a municipality does, the
>>tower will not be illegal, assuming of course that it presents no threat to
>>public safety. To rule otherwise, a court would deprive a tower owner of
>>property and property rights without due process of law.
>>=================
>>At 09:09 PM 7/11/98 -0000, you wrote:
>> >But if the law said "all towers" must have permits after
>>>a certain date, I would say your old tower is included and must have a
>>>permit after that certain date.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm