[Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] New 80 meter Beam design....]

[VE3KKM]

Message-ID: <354FF34B.514E@tbaytel.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 22:21:15 -0700
From: VE3KKM <kmccourt@tbaytel.net>
Reply-To: kmccourt@tbaytel.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-KIT  (Win95; U; 16bit)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "David L. Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New 80 meter Beam design....
References: <1.5.4.16.19980504100029.37ef8558@pop.mindspring.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

HI DAVE AND ALL,
IT`S FUNNY THAT THIS SUBJECT HAS COME UP.I HAVE BEEN LOOKING THROUGH
SOME OF MY OLD QST/CQ MAGS THAT WERE GIVEN TO ME,FOR A TWO ELEMENT BEAM
FOR MYSELF(summer project).I DID MANAGE TO FIND ONE IN THE AUGUST 66
ISSUE OF CQ.
IT USES 36` ELEMENTS ON A 20` BOOM AND CENTER LOADED. ELEMENTS ARE
INSULATED FROM BOOM. NOT SURE HOW WELL IT REALLY WORKS BUT WOULD LIKE TO
GIVE IT A TRY.

HAS ANYONE EVER COME ACROSS OR BUILT ANY GOOD DESIGNS FOR A SMALL BEAM
FOR EIGHTY METERS? SURE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR ABOUT THEM.
73,
Kevin


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm