[TowerTalk] MORE 130 FT TOWER OPTIONS

[Al Williams]

What downsides??

k7puc


-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MORE 130 FT TOWER OPTIONS


>
>At 07:23 AM 12/21/1999 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
>...
>>130 ft  C31XR
>>100 ft  4L15
>>  85 ft  3L20
>>  70 ft  4L15
>>  60 ft  6L10
>>  40 ft  C31XR
>
>An interesting idea, but a question.  Does this presuppose that the
>monoband antennas in the stack would be sections out of the C-31 (i.e.
>similar spacing)?  I've always understood that stacking dissimilar antennas
>is prone to unexpected downsides unless fully modeled.
>
>73,  Pete N4ZR
>
>Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database
>http://206.102.70.3/search.htm
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm