[TowerTalk] Re: c3 vs tennadyne

[Louis Sica, Jr.]

Hello Mike (and crew)

> Re-read my note to
> David, which he posted to the reflector, and see if you still dissagree
with
> what was said and still feel my comments to be "ridiculous".


No, no, no, I'm sorry Mike, I was saying that the comparrison in the book
was ridiculous (being so unfair). not your particular comments. But I
suspect my characterization of it as being unfair was because of my
particular ham radio interests... read on.


> It's true in theory and in practice that a good long boom monobander (like
> Don's 20M 6L) at a height of 1.6 wavelength will have a significant low
angle
> lobe which is great for working DX.  At the same time, however, the array
> which is optimized for DX will not work very well for short distance
> communications when the signals are arriving at a much higher angles.

Of course. And to a contester, and someone who wants reliable stateside
QSO's, this is important. I applied my own narrow interests (DXing and DX
contesting) to my criteria of what is a "better antenna", and what would be
a fair judgement between two antennas based on that. It's the farther-out
stuff that's important to me, and I'd compare two antennas based on that.
Under that criteria, however, I felt it was VERY unfair to compare a 30 foot
log at 60 feet height to a 60 foot monobander at 105 feet height.

I hope this clears up my comments, sorry for the confusion.

Lou AC0X


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm