[TowerTalk] Sidemount yagis
DavidC
DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:18:32 -0400
> Rich,
> Not quite correct. The square foot rating is total, wherever antennas
> are mounted. Kurt, K7NV, has the calculations on his Web site
> proving this for guyed towers, though it intuitively doesn't seem
> correct.
>
> Side mounts create a lot more turning moment (aka torque) on the
> tower when the wind blows. As an example, the Rohn HDBX
> towers have a sq ft rating, but then they go on to say don't use any
> antenna with a boom longer than 12 (?) ft. This is due to torque. I
> believe is the total sq foot rating would need to be derated when
> using a side mount. Maybe one of the PEs can explain in more
> detail...
>
> 73 Barry
So, we should see this as a rather complex calculation?
Where the sidemount is attached (height)? The torque load of the
antenna? The nature of the surrounding area (whether cleared for a
distance or nearby trees and/or buildings that limit the wind stress on
the tower via the antenna? The way the tower has been constructed
(pier pin versus section-in-concrete, guying methodology)? And etc.?
Sure sounds as though a PE is necessary if one gets even a little
close to the recommended limits. Sure appreciate reading this before
I risk carelessly over-loading my tower! (They are forecasting a
rough season of Summer-Fall storms here on the Gulf side of Florida.)
- Thanks! & 73, DavidC K1YP in Hudson, FL
************************************************************************
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm