[TowerTalk] Tall verticals
K7GCO@aol.com
K7GCO@aol.com
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 05:29:30 EDT
In a message dated 07.04.00 19:41:03 Pacific Daylight Time, n4kg@juno.com
writes:
<<
I recommend against shunt feeding tall towers
with side mounted antennas.
I had a 130 ft R35 tower with a 3L15 on top and 3L20
side mounted at 63 ft along with an 80M inverted vee
at 110 ft. It worked on 160 but was noticeably less
competitive after I added the side mounted 3L20.
I believe it altered the current flow in the tower and
suspect there was a phase reversal in the upper
half, partially canceling the vertically polarized
radiation.
de Tom N4KG
>>
Why not try another shunt origination point like higher that compensates for
what ever additional loading effect the 3L20 had? Flexible shunt systems
don't have to be originated at the ground only. I had 9 on one tower with
single and double radials (even upper and lower guy wires) with some
directional affect connected to the coax center lead selected with a home
made remote coax switch half way up the tower fed with a single heavy coax.
I compared them to other verticals for reference. When not used the
individual horizontal radials were not connected to anything and of the wrong
polarization to have any vertically polarized pattern affect with the system
I used. The selected radial used the tower in a beneficial way. 9 multiple
shunt feeds on tower the normal way could be a big mess. I believe the
system I used also raised the phase center off the ground. Many of the
horizontal radials ends were connected to rope guys (no Phillistrand then)
for supports back in the late 40's. If the guys were too close I ran the
additional lengths up and or down or both the rope for resonance. If
something is changed that affects an antenna, find a new solution. Sometimes
it's better than the previous. Sometimes the least expected combination
works real well. I always have a remote coax switch on a tower for this type
of shunt loading. To be effective a configuration doesn't have to be 100%
vertical or horizontal. Before Eznec I didn't know what I had and didn't
care if I could break a pile up. With Eznec one can see what to expect for
polarization. Now I just initially favor any combo with some directivity
regardless of the polarization percentage. There is still some cut, install
and compare--I recommend full time looking for improvements. The excitement
and reward of an improvement other than conventional still exists. K7GCO.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm