[TowerTalk] HF2V with Elevated Mount - Experience?
George T. Daughters
gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:23:22 -0800
Hi all,
Regarding the HF2V... I have one, roof mounted with the base
at about 16 feet off the ground. I have six radials stretched
across my roof; four are approximately 1/4 wave at 40m and
two are 1/4 wave at 80m.
Tom (N4KG) wrote...
> The HF2V is BASE loaded on 80M.
> Base loading is the LEAST efficient
> and provides the least bandwidth.
True. The instructions for the HF2V tell how to
attach wires for a "top hat" which improves efficiency on 80m, but
foregoes 40m operation.
> KZ4V found her HF2V to be quite
> effective on 40M with 120 radials
> but was NOT competitive on 80M.
My experience is similar. Mine works quite well on 40, not very well on 80.
BUT!... a "NOT competitive" antenna is way better than NO antenna.
The MFJ unit mentioned by Tom bears some looking at. I think Force
12 also makes some vertical dipoles.
73,
George T. Daughters, K6GT
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com