[TowerTalk] Re: Cope Right Legalities
Doctor Cornelius
drcornelius@hotmail.com
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 11:23:47 EST
WIDE OR NARROW (THANKS FOR THE DOUBLE POST), PLEASE STOP SHOUTING THE LONG
INANE POSTS IN CAPS. PLEASE! (Is ANYone getting anything useful from these
posts??
>From: K7GCO@aol.com
>To: Towertalk@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Cope Right Legalities
>Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:59:44 EST
>
>
>W A N T E D: ATTORNEY HAM OF AT LEAST 25 YEARS, HIGHLY EXPERIENCED IN COPY
>RIGHT, PATENT LAW AND MOLE HILL MOUNTAIN CLIMBING, TO GIVE PRO BONO LAW
>OPINION (FREE) ON TT OF MATTER TAKING UP TT SPACE THAT SHOULD BE USED FOR
>AIRING USUAL BUT VERY USEFUL BAND-AIDS FOR DEFICIENTLY DESIGNED EQUIPMENT
>AND
>OTHER VERY USEFUL CORRECTIVE AND LONGEVITY CONCEPTS WE ALL LOVE TO USE. IF
>POSTS BELOW AREN'T ENOUGH BAD EVIDENCE, THE REST CAN BE SUBPOENAED. IN
>APPRECIATION, TT HAMDUMB--(CORRECTION) HAMDOOM--HAMDOME--HAMDOM (TAKE YOUR
>PICK) WILL PROVIDE PRO-BONO TECHNICAL (FREE TECHNICAL ADVICE, ALUMINUM
>TUBING
>LIKE--6' x3/4"x.058"--OTHER PARTS AND OTHER ASSISTANCE IF CLOSE) TO YOU IN
>EXCHANGE. CERTAIN OF US WOULD EVEN APPEAR AS TECHNICAL WITNESSES IN COURT
>FOR YOU IF EVER NEEDED. (WE UNDERSTAND IF YOU WOULD PREFER TO DECLINE OUR
>OFFER--PARTICULARLY FOR COURT). WE MUST SOLVE THIS MONUMENTAL LEGAL
>COPYRIGHT MOLE HILL MADE TO A MOUNTAIN PROBLEM AND WILL ALSO TELL NO MORE
>LAWYER JOKES IF YOU SOLVE THE PROBLEM. OTHER LAWYERS WILL LOVE YOU. IF
>YOU
>DON'T WE WILL CONTINUE AND TELL EVEN MORE DUMB LAWYER JOKES. SUCH A DEAL!
>
>(Why can't all the collective expertise on TT solve this simple legal
>problem? Why don't we ask those who know when we don't--I even do that?
>If
>there is an Attorney Ham that reads this--why hasn't he volunteered advice?
>Maybe there is a reason? K7GCO)
>
> In a message dated 25.02.00 05:56:39 Pacific Standard Time,
>Jan.E.Holm@telia.se writes:<<
> How can the physical dimensions of an antenna be
> copyrighted, please explain. I still insist, by the same token,
> taking a picture of the same antenna must then be illegal.
> Also I insist, if I hypothecicaly would build an EXACT
> copy of an C31XR I might be walking on thin ice.
> However I think it´s OK if I do so and only have it for
> personal use. If I make an EXACT copy and start to
> sell it I´m sure Force12 would sue me. In this case the above
> wasn´t the issue. YU1AO only published a file with dimensions
> for a C31XR and that surely cannot violate the copyright laws.
> That's the BS old chap and no I don´t have to wish you 73 either
> but since I´m a lot nicer then you I still will so a big
> 73 to you old chap. de Jim SM2EKM
> ------------------------------------
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: davidw@copper.net [SMTP:davidw@copper.net]
> Skickat: den 25 februari 2000 12:48
> Till: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se
> Ämne: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: C31XR?FINAL
> Look, 'Jim':
> What the YU published was copyrighted. *That's* what's at issue, so
> your bombast is, as before, continuation of an attempt to defend the
> indefensible. I quote the last paragraph of your intemperate response:
>"So
> you see most of what you have been writing in this matter is *nothing*
>like
> pure BS." (emphasis mine). Yes, you're correct: no BS from this end.
>
> BTW, your post puts me in company I admire. Did you forget to include
> that response as well? *no* 73 K3BH
>
> <<Fil: RE_ [TowerTalk] Re_ C31XR_FINAL.TXT>>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm