[TowerTalk] Towertalk Admin Change

[N2TK]

I also concur with Pete and Steve on this. I had a question censored about
preamps on the low bands, which turned out to be of interest to others. Less
intereference is better

Tony

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-towertalk@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]  On Behalf Of K7LXC@aol.com
Sent:	Sunday, February 27, 2000 11:35 AM
To:	n4zr@contesting.com; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [TowerTalk] Towertalk Admin Change


In a message dated 98-11-16 16:09:20 EST, n4zr@contesting.com writes:

> >Pete, N4ZR and I are not on the same page as to the direction of this
>  >reflector.  Pete is more inclined to less or no censorship.  I am
inclined
>  >to moderate the list completely.  Regardless, our difference of opinion
>  >has prompted Pete to resign as admin of the reflector.
>  >
>  >If you have interest in doing the job please let me know.  I have only
one
>  >requirement...  You must be willing to keep the reflector on topic.
>
>  Bill, I was with you till that last half-sentence.
>
>  I did not want to "moderate" the reflector  -- interposing myself between
>  every message and the list -- for two reasons.
>
>  First, I have a basic philosophical discomfort with prior restraint of
>  speech.  My preferred mode of operation was to message people directly
and,
>  occasionally, to post a public request that a given thread be
discontinued.
>
>  Second, because I have a real job, acting as moderator would often impose
>  some delay in the posting of messages on the reflector, resulting in
missed
>  deadlines for needed information and, probably, some degree of double-
> posting.
>
>  Bill doesn't feel my approach is firm enough, and the reflector exists
>  through his generosity, so he gets to decide.

     TowerTalk is a unique resource. Anyone can ask a question (there's no
such thing as a dumb one) and get mostly credible answers. There is a
noticeable lack of spamming, name calling, etc. because almost everyone acts
their age and respects their fellow TowerTalkians. Outbursts are rare and
end
pretty quickly. THANK YOU ALL FOR THAT!

      I was the original administrator for TowerTalk and did it for 2-1/2
years. I found that threads that started to go off-topic fizzled out about
the same time whether I got all hot-and-bothered about them or just let them
die a natural death so I took the route that entailed the least mental and
physical toll.

    I'm not in favor of a moderated list for the same reasons that Pete
states - it's a helluva lot of work and I also would prefer not to have TT
traffic censored.

    IMO TowerTalk isn't broken and doesn't need to be fixed. Please let's
leave it unmoderated.

Cheers,   Steve    K7LXC
Tower Tech

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm