[TowerTalk] (no subject)

K7GCO@aol.com K7GCO@aol.com
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 01:27:25 EST


In a message dated 22.01.00 20:29:43 Pacific Standard Time, 
ve3bbh@interlog.com writes:

<< From:    ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul - VE3ZT)
 To:    K7GCO@aol.com
 
 Everything you said in your TT post makes complete sense. Thanks for the info
 and suggestions.
 
 73, Paul
 VE3ZT

    Thank you Paul.  It's nice to know that there are some that can see the 
wisdom of ones thinking based on 60 years experience and let you know. A fair 
amount of that time was on top of a tower or pole.  Take another 
look--there's more on all the advantages of Telephone Pole Supports for Ham 
Antennas--not Power Lines and other Commercial Loads which everyone wants to 
evaluate telephone poles on.  It is Totally Irrelevant.  Think only of 
"Typical Antenna Loads" when evaluating antenna supports.  Most are 50' high.
K7GCO

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm