[TowerTalk] Stacking
Barry Kutner
w2up@mindspring.com
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:12:27 -0000
Hi Steve:
Isn't a modest stack an oxymoron? :.)
I have a TH7 stack and have never found any degradation when the
antennas (both rotatable) point in different directions. Take the
worst case scenario - antennas pointed 180 degrees apart.
Suppose your F/B is 20 db or so. You have 1 KW going out, and
the other antenna has 10W out of phase in the same direction,
providing some cancellation. Not very significant in the real world,
is it?
At times, I find splitting the signal to be a big advantage - for
example, early morning on 20 when I point the upper at JA and the
lower at EU.
73 Barry
On 4 Jul 00, nn4t@bellsouth.net wrote:
>
> I apologize if this topic has been discussed before, but I don't
> remember it coming up. I have modest stacks of monobanders for 10, 15
> and 20 on separate towers. On each the top antenna rotates while the
> lower is fixed on Europe. When running Europe I always try to align the
> antennas as best I can. My assumption is the better aligned the
> antennas, the better the pattern. My question is, how critical is this
> alignment? Is there a point where some cancellation/degradation of the
> pattern begins to take place? Or would having one antenna at 30 degrees
> and the other at 55 give you broader coverage to the various countries
> of Europe? Thank you. Steve, NN4T.
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com