[TowerTalk] Traps and Losses

[Guy Olinger, K2AV]

I should think that they would have a strong $$$ motive to reduce
ratings if there was a heat-related catastrophe point operating at legal
amateur power levels.

- - . . .   . . . - -     .   . . .     - - .   . - . .

73, Guy
k2av@contesting.com
Apex, NC, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Traps and Losses


>
> At 12:06 AM 7/18/00 -0400, Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
> ...
> >Regarding whether or not Mosley traps might prove to be
*destroyable*,
> >e.g. meltdown, by heat at ordinary amateur power levels, I offer this
> >rather obvious material from Mosley's own web site. See:
> >
> >     http://www.mosley-electronics.com/amateur.htm
>
> Ingenious analysis, Guy, but since Mosley also claims >8 "dbD" gain on
> 10-20 meters from the  3-element CL-33 with an 18-foot boom, why
should we
> believe that anything posted there has a basis in fact?
>
> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR
>
> The World Contest Station Database
> is back up and running at
> http://www.qsl.net/n4zr
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com