[TowerTalk] Re: Beam Headings
Bill Coleman AA4LR
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:11:01 -0500
On 3/13/00 11:37 PM, Wes Attaway at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Call me a simpleton if you want to, but I think the recent thread on "lat,
>long, beam headings, etc" begs the question: Why worry about exact headings?
>I offer the following thoughts:
>1. Most HF beams have 3-db beamwidths of somewhere between 30 and 60
So, it doesn't matter where you're pointed, exactly.
>2. There is usually some degree of "play" as the beam rocks back and forth
>in the wind;
>3. Most rotor direction indicating schemes are not perfectly accurate all
>the way around, and tend to become less accurate over time;
And you can't tell where you're pointed, exactly.
>4. Many DX paths for "best signal" (particularly on long path routes) turn
>out to be dramatically different from what you would expect from looking at
>a chart; you find the best signal, if necessary, by moving your beam back
This seems to contradict point 1 -- if the beamwidths are really that
broad, do you really need to rock the antenna back and forth to peak it
up? Psychological value, perhaps?
>5. Finally, after about 45-years of DXing with all sorts of beams (the last
>20 with two big Telrex yagis) I have yet to find a single situation where
>knowing the precise heading of the DX, and the precise direction my beam was
>pointing, had any bearing on my ability to work the DX. I use essentially 4
>directions ..... approximately SE, NE, NW, and SW. Sometimes I use E, N,
>and W (I don't remember ever pointing my beam due South). That's it.
This is a great point. Precise aiming isn't needed -- fire the beam
"thataway" will do it.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: email@example.com
Quote: "Boot, you transistorized tormentor! Boot!"
-- Archibald Asparagus, VeggieTales
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com