[TowerTalk] Adjacent BC AM sigs DE K0FF
K7GCO@aol.com
K7GCO@aol.com
Tue, 9 May 2000 11:35:14 EDT
In a message dated 08.05.00 08:20:48 Pacific Daylight Time, w4ef@pacbell.net
writes:
<<
I thought a Q-multiplier was an active stage - wouldn't it be susceptible
to IMD just like the front-end you are trying to cure?
As I recall the Drake R4C had a pretty narrow passive preselector -
but it was still something like 20 to 30 KHz wide (-6dB?? points) on
160 meters - not enough for BC adjacent channel rejection.
Mike, W4EF. >>
I believe intermod is created more in stages with a a mixer? The Q
multiplier as K3BU suggested doesn't have one if I remember right. A preamp
only, as frequently used is no different from the 1st RF stage used in tube
receivers--without a mixer. Buy cutting it's gain so it doesn't overload the
front end of a receiver, is capable of giving greater selectivity before the
receiver and is a very good design as I suggested in a previous post..
k7gco
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm