[TowerTalk] 5 db required to see?
Larry Lindblom
w0etc@ix.netcom.com
Thu, 25 May 2000 23:35:28 +0000
Steve, those of us in the middle of the country might modify the equation to
include a 3rd variable, that variable being location. I'd hate to guess how
many times stations on the east coast with an 80 meter dipole at 60m feet have
beat a midwestern 4 square through the pileup for a semi rare european (e.g.
3A1). What would happen in WRTC if the stations and operators were identical
but they were scattered all over the USA instead of in a limited geographic
area?
DE W0ETC in IA
K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 05/25/2000 7:12:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> aa4lr@radio.org writes:
>
> > Another aspect may come into play. It's conceivable that a modestly
> > skilled operator using a not-to-directional antenna, and unfamiliar with
> > all the nuances of propagation could capture more multipliers by chance
> > than the same operator with a very directional antenna.
> >
> > I'm of the opinion that operator skill is a bigger factor in producing
> > scores than antennas.
>
> Totally agree. I think it's 80% operator and 20% hardware - or even
> more on the operator side. In the first WRTC in Seattle in 1990, the best
> stations didn't win.
>
> Cheers, Steve K7LXC
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm