[TowerTalk] Broken OWA monobander - Help!

Steve ve3tu@rac.ca
Sat, 25 Nov 2000 20:31:47 +0000


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<tt>Hi Dan, I didn't model your anntenna(I use eznec) but I would tend
to believe the numbers you got from the MFJ analyzer. The model SWR numbers
sound a little too good to be true.</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>gl es 73 Steve VE3TU</tt>
<p>Dan Levin wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I am building a three stack of 10 meter OWA design
yagi's for the upcoming
<br>10 meter contest.&nbsp; I just raised the first one to 35', and it
doesn't
<br>exhibit anything like the impedence curve that I expected.&nbsp; Any
hints,
<br>sugggestions, etc. on what might be wrong and how to fix it would be
most
<br>welcome.
<p>The antenna was built out of an old KLM Big Sticker 6 element monobander.&nbsp;
I
<br>took the KLM elements, and removed them from their black plastic insulators,
<br>leaving me with 6' pieces of 5/8" tubing tapered at one end to 1/2".&nbsp;
I
<br>joined two of these with 12" of 3/4" .058 wall tubing at the center,
then
<br>added back on the KLM 3/8" tips.&nbsp;&nbsp; The driven element is
split at the center
<br>with a fiberglass rod, and fed with a Force 12 B1 balun.
<p>Here is the design (half-elements):
<p>.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; .625"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; .5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
.375"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Total length&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Spacing
<br>6"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 32.375"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
108.625"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 69.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 32.125"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
104.375"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 44"
<br>6"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 22.375"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
98.625"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 69"
<br>6"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67.75&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 20.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
96.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 131"
<br>6"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 20.625"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
96.875"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 193"
<br>6"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67.75"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2.5"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 16.125"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
92.375"&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 282"
<p>The antenna models in NEC4WIN95 to show between 38 and 53 ohms real
and less
<br>than 10 ohms imaginary. The SWR for 50 ohm coax is less than 1.3:1
across
<br>the band, with a dip to 1.08:1 at 28.8 Mhz.
<p>The real antenna looks like this, according to my MFJ-259B (vs. 50 ohm
coax)
<p>28.0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 30 + 10 = 1.7
<br>28.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 29 + 8&nbsp; = 1.7
<br>28.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 29 + 6&nbsp; = 1.7
<br>28.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 29 + 6&nbsp; = 1.7
<br>28.4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 30 + 8&nbsp; = 1.6
<br>28.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 31 + 8&nbsp; = 1.5
<br>28.6&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 33 + 9&nbsp; = 1.5
<br>28.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 35 + 8&nbsp; = 1.5
<br>28.8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 35 + 7&nbsp; = 1.4
<br>28.9&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 33 + 8&nbsp; = 1.5
<br>29.0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 28 + 8&nbsp; = 1.8
<p>I wouldn't care, except that I plan to stack this antenna with a StackMatch,
<br>and the power distribution will be uneven if the other antenna behaves
as
<br>expected.
<p>The problem is that I can't figure out how to 'break' my model to give
the
<br>above results.&nbsp; Just changing the length of the first director
doesn't fix
<br>it.
<p>Any ideas of what might be wrong?&nbsp; My best current guess is that
the driven
<br>element is too short, probably because my model doesn't accurately
deal with
<br>the rod and feed wires from the balun.&nbsp; But that, by itself, doesn't
account
<br>for the very low feed impdenence.
<p>Could my instrument be bad?&nbsp; Can anyone think of what I might have
done
<br>wrong?&nbsp; I am pretty sure that the element lengths are as modeled,
to within
<br>.125" or so.
<p>Thanks a million!
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ***dan,
K6IF
<p>--
<br>FAQ on WWW:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk">http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk</a>
<br>Submissions:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
towertalk@contesting.com
<br>Administrative requests:&nbsp; towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
<br>Problems:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
owner-towertalk@contesting.com</blockquote>
</html>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com