[TowerTalk] FCC RF Safety Regs Info Sept 1

[michael watts]

Don't rely on the judge being reasonable.  Gather
enough evidence of other violations of any and all of
the terms of the old CCRs where these to have not been
enforced with injunctive relief.  Then present such a
mass of this (document in written form with photos so
it can all be entered into evidence in one fell swoop)
and give the judge no way out.  Notify the judge ahead
of time thru lawyers (if your lawyers feel they can do
this without it being interpreted as a threat) that
you will appeal if the judge finds against you. 
Knowing that an appeals judge will review his finding
will force the judge to give in to your mass of
evidence.

Mike wy6k
--- "W4EF@dellroy.com" <W4EF@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kurt,
> 
> Despite cries from a few vocal neighbors, the city
> granted my friend the building permit
> for his 54 foot Triex crank-up (nested height of
> 21'). Although the tower has been installed
> and inspected by the city, my friend is currently
> under orders not to do anything with the
> tower until a judge can review his neighbor's
> petition for a temporary injunction against
> the tower installation. The neighbors injunction is
> based upon an extremely imaginative
> interpretation of old CCRs which were written for a
> now defunct homeowners association
> which at one time had jurisdiction over my friends
> property (the old CCRs don't explicitly
> prohibit antenna installations). My gut feeling is
> that my friend will prevail if the presiding
> judge reviewing the motion for injunction is at all
> reasonable (his neighbor's case is full of
> holes).
> 
> Mike,
>
W4EF................................................................................................................................
> .......
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kurt Andress" <K7NV@contesting.com>
> To: "W4EF@dellroy.com" <W4EF@earthlink.net>
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FCC RF Safety Regs Info
> Sept 1
> 
> 
> > "W4EF@dellroy.com" wrote:
> >
> > > I think this problem is overstated. I gave it
> some thought when a friend of
> > > mines tower
> > > permit went to public hearing recently.
> Handwringing over potential harm
> > > caused by
> > > amateur antennas that are typically many feet
> from exposed subjects, is
> > > easily put in
> > > prespective when you compare it with the
> proximity of the typical cellular
> > > telephone
> > > handset. How many "peasants with pitchforks" are
> going to deny a ham radio
> > > operator
> > > his tower permit in exchange for losing the
> convenience of their cell
> > > phones? Especially
> > > when you consider that a tower generally reduces
> public exposure levels when
> > > compared
> > > to the typical stealthy attic dipole.
> > >
> > > Of course I am assuming that the peasants are
> capable of making logical
> > > conclusions. One
> > > of the written comments that my friend received
> in response to the public
> > > hearing notice for his
> > > tower permit was from a medical doctor who was
> expressing concern over the
> > > potential
> > > "radiation fallout" from his antenna. Perhaps
> Cushcraft is putting depleted
> > > Uranium in their
> > > antennas and not telling us.
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > >
>
W4EF........................................................................
> > > .....................................
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Yikes! And the guy is supposed to be an educated
> person!
> >
> > How did ur friend do in getting the special use
> permit? The locals just went
> > stupid here with a 35' restriction and that is the
> way I have to go to put up a
> > tower. Everything here for the last 5 years has
> been bootleg and all illegal in
> > the face of the new code. No problems so far.
> >
> > --
> > 73, Kurt, K7NV
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:              
> http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: 
> towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                
> owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com