[TowerTalk] Opinions please--re: 40-2CD compared to XM-240
K7LXC@aol.com
K7LXC@aol.com
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:01:17 EDT
In a message dated 4/18/01 9:35:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time, n9en@voyager.net
writes:
> I used the "CW setting"
> for element lengths, etc., as I operate abt 99-1/2% CW.
> For what I consider to be a "small, light-weight antenna,"
> the 40-2CD is a VERY GOOD performer. With the
> settings that I used, the antenna is usable only in the CW
> portion of the band. I don't know anything about adjust-
> ing it to some "mid-setting."
The "Secret LXC Settings" for the 402CD are to use a measurement between
CW and MID. That way you get 250 kHz of bandwidth with 2:1 points of 7.000
and 7.250. I don't know if this works for the XM.
Cheers, Steve K7LXC
Tower Tech
List Sponsor: ChampionRadio.com - Trylon self-supporting towers,
safety equipment, rigging gear, LOOS tension guages & more!
http://www.championradio.com
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com