[TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more)
Mike Gilmer - N2MG
23 Dec 2001 20:20:49 -0800
On Mon, 24 December 2001, "alex" wrote:
> I do not think that it was a misstatement. When you
> deploy something in a CRITICAL environment
> you need to think at the System level.
This is obvious. Your statement:
"The sensitivity of an IC to it's environment,
depends on SYSTEM design and not on the IC itself"
is incorrect. Both "system" and "IC" desing need to be
taken into account. Why use a "weak" IC when a more
robust one is available?
> Integrated Circuits are very vulnerable, even
> Hardrads, if their limitations are not incorporated
> in the total System Design. In the Ham case the
> Antenna Field represents a Radiation Hazard for the
> IC. Thus Hamming is out of the door and you need
> start thinking as a "rocket engineer" :)
My point exactly. Why force the needs of a rocket
designer on a ham who simply wants a one-time only,
inexpensive, reliable design? There are practically
no size or weight limitations... no acceleration, no
vibration, no altitude, no corona, etc.
A mature designer knows when simple is better - even
if not as much fun.
PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart.
AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading tables,
foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com