[TowerTalk] Resonance of loaded Parasitic Elements
Thu, 6 Sep 2001 05:43:47 -0600
A 5% lower resonant frequency for the reflector is a good place
to start. It seems to me that one way to do this is to split and
insulate the reflector and then either grid dip the element or
measure the impedance at the center. Once it is tuned, then
it may be joined and mounted to the boom. Yes, there may be
some detuning effects but I would expect them to be small for
a 40M element.
73 / GL, Tom N4KG
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 "K&L" <email@example.com> writes:
> Hi All , I am in the process of building a loaded two element 40
> beam. I
> have the driven element finished and its total length is 43` it is
> @ 7.150. What would the most practical way to tune the reflector be
> ? Should
> I split & insulate the reflector , mount it on the boom and check
> resonate frequency ? Is 5 % longer a good length ? I am not quite
> sure of
> the best way method to use . Would like to get some input on this .
> 73 Kevin
> List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower
> Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our
> supporting towers up to 96 feet for under $1500!!
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: email@example.com
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems,
Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self
supporting towers up to 96 feet for under $1500!! http://www.anwireless.com
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com