[Towertalk] re: Burying RG213 coax

Guy Olinger, K2AV k2av@contesting.com
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:35:47 -0400


ATTENUATION beyond standard, unexpected impedance transformation or
open circuit. All measurable with a 259B.

When water gets in, it will go south very fast.

73.

----- Original Message -----
From: <n4kg@juno.com>
To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] re: Burying RG213 coax


> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002  n8ug@juno.com writes:
>
> > Ron, the claim that a legitimate RG213 is OK for direct burial is
one
> > of the most common misconceptions in the business.
> > 1. It is not so rated and never has been. It has a Class IIA
> > (non-contaminating) jacket which is good for 10-15 years ABOVE
> > ground in sun , or most any environment except in the earth.
> > Many dealers in  the amateur community still spreads the direct
> > buriable myth, sad to  say.
>
> What signs should one look for to determine
> if an RG213 cable has deteriorated ?
>
> In other words, how does one tell
> if an old cable needs to be replaced?
>
> Tom  N4KG
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>